Sunday, October 29, 2006

 

I no longer have a sense of shame.

I must admit that I love this trailer.



 

A Change?

There are three people I would like to see in the next Senate: James Webb, Harold Ford, and Michael Steele. Two Democrats, one Republican: am I getting soft in my old age?




Sunday, October 22, 2006

 

Freedom and Order?


Judicial independence is an oxymoron of dubious value. What is a judge independent of? Politics? The People? Fine, that independence is all well and good as long as the judge is dependent on the text of the constitution and the law. And our judicial system hasn’t bothered with the actual written law for a very long time.


 

Wouldn’t it be nice…


Wouldn’t it be nice if people just dropped the word Neo-con from their vocabulary? It is a word used by people who don’t know what it means and don’t have the intellectual depth to understand what it means.

The Neo-cons were the Left’s idealistic anti-communists of the sixties and seventies. They (Irving Kristol, Bill Kristol, Daniel Patrick Moynihan etc.) demanded that pushing democracy on the world and emphasizing human rights should be the centerpieces of US foreign policy. And the simple fact is that the Neo-Cons supported all of Clinton’s interventions (Bosnia, Kosovo, etc.). And somehow no one on the Left complained.

The real question that should be answered is should the United States use military force to push a democratic and human rights agenda? That is the important debate that is not happening.

We have done it before. We have gone to war for idealistic reasons and without UN approval. Lucky for us we fought it from 20,000 feet and it was for us relatively bloodless. Iraq has been a messy. However the agenda is the same. If you supported the Kosovo intervention then you can still disagree with the tactics used in Iraq, but you cannot coherently disagree with the strategy.

P.S. Interestingly the best critiques of neo-conservatism have come from the right and are a few decades old. Russell Kirk was not a fan.


 

This cannot be true.

This has not hit the mainstream media yet, so its authenticity is unknown. It is being reported that an internal KGB memo from the early eighties describes Senator Ted Kennedy’s overtures to the Soviet Union. Specifically the memo describes a possible political deal between Kennedy and Prime Minister Yuri Andropov to improve the USSR’s image and weaken the Reagan Presidency.


Wouldn’t that be treason?



This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?