Monday, January 30, 2006
Television at its Best
If you have not seen the O'Reilly Letterman Donnybrook yet, I humbly suggest that you watch it.
I happen to respect both f these guys. Letterman is hysterical, and what O'Reilly did when he took on the Red Cross after 9-11 was the closest thing to heroism that journalism can reach.
Letterman has no real argument and O'Reilly is on the money. Now that we are in, we have to win (Call that the Johnny Cochrane Argument.) The audience's reaction is priceless. They, subtly, come around to O'Reilly's points. Which are very good.
I happen to respect both f these guys. Letterman is hysterical, and what O'Reilly did when he took on the Red Cross after 9-11 was the closest thing to heroism that journalism can reach.
Letterman has no real argument and O'Reilly is on the money. Now that we are in, we have to win (Call that the Johnny Cochrane Argument.) The audience's reaction is priceless. They, subtly, come around to O'Reilly's points. Which are very good.
Comments:
<< Home
Letterman's stunning rhetorical abilities are shown with brilliant arguments such as
"I'm not smart enough to debate you"
and, of course
"60% of what you say is crap"
Is the left devoid of serious arguments? By God, what makes you say that?
Post a Comment
"I'm not smart enough to debate you"
and, of course
"60% of what you say is crap"
Is the left devoid of serious arguments? By God, what makes you say that?
<< Home
