Thursday, March 02, 2006
Bork!
“It ought to be a major intellectual event in constitutional law when a Justice of the Supreme Court comes forward publicly to explain his theory of judging. Explanation is needed, for by now nobody familiar with the work of the Court believes it confines its rulings to the principles of the historic Constitution.”
I get it now. Bork was just too honest to get through the Senate. The Bloviators cannot stand to see their antithesis.
